1.Dummy¡¯s development trend
  • New Dummies
  • SID IIs-FRG Injury Criteria
1. HIC36 < 100
2. Resultant Lower Spine Acceleration < 82 G¡¯s
3.

Lateral Pelvis Force < 5100 N

(where, Lateral Pelvic Force = Acetabulum Force+illiac Force)

  
  • ES-2re Injury Criteria
1. HIC36 < 1000
2. Chest Deflection < 42 mm
3. Resultant Lower Spine Acceleration < 82 G¡¯s
4. Abdominal Injury < 2500 N
5. Pubic Symphysis Force < 6000 N
  
2.Dummy of new testing method
  
why the new NPRM?
  • NHTSA estimates when fully implemented will save 700-1000 lives per year
  • Protection to wide range of occupant sizes
  • Expand injury criteria to include head region
  • For a greater population of vehicles
  • Over a broader range of seating position

Based on 32,335 fatalities in the year 2002. According to Pie Chart 1,approx. 7400 fatalities were due to side impact, of those approx. 4500 fatalities(from Pie Chart 2) were due to side impacts with narrow objects or other LTVS.

Old Vs. New

Existing Pole Test (FMVSS 201P) Proposed Pole Test (Upgraded FMVSS 214)
Test speed = 29kph Test speed = 32kph
Vehicle Angle = 90¡ã Vehicle Angle = 75¡ã
Dummies = SIDHIII 50th percentile male Dummies = SID2S-FRG, ES2-RE
Head Injuries Head, Thorax and Pelvic Injuries
Note: The setup for the proposed pole test is similar to the setup for the existing pole test.
    
Old Vs. New
Existing MDB test
(FMVSS 214 Dynamic)
Proposed MDB test
(Upgraded FMVSS 214)
Thoracic and Pelvic injuries
Head,Thoracic and Pelvic Injuries
Dummies: SID 50th percentile male
Dummies: SID2S-FRG, ES2-re
Note: The test conditions for the proposed MDB test are similar to the current MDB test
   

motor drive system of E-car

vehicle chassis dynamometer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

copyright£ºshanghai enpro technology co.,ltd
Technical support £ºxaad.com